Overview
Both AES-GCM and ChaCha20-Poly1305 are modern AEAD (Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data) algorithms providing confidentiality, integrity, and authentication in a single operation. Key Decision Factors:- Hardware availability (AES-NI vs pure software)
- Performance requirements
- Platform (server, mobile, embedded)
- Security requirements (side-channel resistance)
- Compliance needs (NIST, FIPS)
Quick Comparison
| Feature | AES-GCM | ChaCha20-Poly1305 |
|---|---|---|
| Standard | NIST SP 800-38D | RFC 8439 (IETF) |
| Key Size | 128, 192, 256-bit | 256-bit only |
| Nonce Size | 96-bit (recommended) | 96-bit (fixed) |
| Tag Size | 128-bit (default) | 128-bit (fixed) |
| Speed (Hardware) | Very Fast (3-5 GB/s) | Fast (1-2 GB/s) |
| Speed (Software) | Slow (50-200 MB/s) | Very Fast (1-2 GB/s) |
| Mobile Performance | Good (with NEON) | Excellent |
| Side-Channel Resistance | Vulnerable (without HW) | Resistant |
| Implementation Complexity | High (GF multiplication) | Low (simple ops) |
| NIST Approved | Yes (FIPS 140) | No |
| Adoption | Widespread (TLS, IPsec) | Growing (TLS 1.3, WireGuard) |
| Best For | Server w/ AES-NI | Mobile, Embedded, Software-only |
Detailed Comparison
Performance
Server (Intel/AMD with AES-NI)
AES-GCM (Hardware):- Encryption: 3-5 GB/s
- Decryption: 3-5 GB/s
- Key derivation: Fast (hardware-accelerated)
- Encryption: 1-2 GB/s
- Decryption: 1-2 GB/s
- Key derivation: Same as AES-GCM
Mobile (ARM with NEON)
AES-GCM (NEON):- Encryption: 300-800 MB/s
- Decryption: 300-800 MB/s
- Battery: Higher consumption
- Encryption: 500 MB/s - 1 GB/s
- Decryption: 500 MB/s - 1 GB/s
- Battery: Lower consumption
Embedded (No Crypto Hardware)
AES-GCM (Software):- Encryption: 5-20 MB/s
- Decryption: 5-20 MB/s
- Side-channel: Vulnerable
- Encryption: 10-50 MB/s
- Decryption: 10-50 MB/s
- Side-channel: Resistant
Security Properties
Confidentiality
AES-GCM:- AES-128: ~2¹²⁸ security (quantum: ~2⁶⁴)
- AES-256: ~2²⁵⁶ security (quantum: ~2¹²⁸)
- NIST approved for classified data
- 256-bit key: ~2²⁵⁶ security (quantum: ~2¹²⁸)
- Not NIST approved (but widely trusted)
Authentication
AES-GCM:- 128-bit GMAC tag
- Based on finite field multiplication
- Forgery probability: ~2⁻¹²⁸
- 128-bit Poly1305 tag
- Based on polynomial evaluation
- Forgery probability: ~2⁻¹²⁸
Side-Channel Resistance
AES-GCM (Software):- Vulnerable to cache-timing attacks
- Table lookups leak information
- Requires constant-time implementation
- Mitigated by AES-NI (hardware)
- Resistant to cache-timing attacks
- No table lookups (bitwise operations only)
- Constant-time by design
- No hardware required
Implementation Complexity
AES-GCM
Complexity: High- Cache-timing vulnerabilities
- Side-channel leaks in multiplication
- Incorrect tag verification
- Nonce handling errors
ChaCha20-Poly1305
Complexity: Low- No table lookups (simpler)
- No complex finite field math
- Easier to audit
- More resistant to implementation bugs
Standards and Compliance
AES-GCM
Standards:- NIST SP 800-38D
- FIPS 197 (AES)
- FIPS 140-2/140-3 approved
- Required for US government (FIPS)
- PCI DSS approved
- HIPAA approved
- Widely accepted worldwide
- TLS 1.2/1.3 (most common cipher)
- IPsec
- Disk encryption (BitLocker, FileVault)
- Widespread industry use
ChaCha20-Poly1305
Standards:- RFC 8439 (IETF)
- RFC 7539 (TLS)
- Not NIST/FIPS approved
- Not required by regulations
- Trusted by cryptographic community
- TLS 1.3 (mandatory cipher suite)
- WireGuard VPN
- Signal Protocol
- OpenSSH
- Growing adoption
Nonce Management
Both algorithms require unique nonces
Same vulnerability: Nonce reuse catastrophic for both- AES-GCM: 96 bits recommended (can use 1 to 2⁶⁴ bits)
- ChaCha20-Poly1305: 96 bits (fixed)
- Both: ~2³² encryptions per key (random nonces)
- Both: Unlimited with counter-based nonces
Use Case Recommendations
Server-Side Encryption (with AES-NI)
Recommendation: AES-GCM- 2-3x faster with hardware acceleration
- NIST approved (compliance)
- Widespread industry adoption
- Well-tested in production
Mobile Apps
Recommendation: ChaCha20-Poly1305- Faster on ARM processors
- Lower battery consumption
- No hardware dependencies
- Better consistency across devices
Embedded Systems
Recommendation: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Why:- Fast without crypto hardware
- Constant-time (side-channel resistant)
- Smaller code size
- Simpler to implement correctly
VPN/Tunneling
Recommendation: ChaCha20-Poly1305 Examples: WireGuard, OpenSSH Why:- Fast on all platforms
- Simpler protocol design
- Better mobile performance
- Constant-time security
Database Encryption
Recommendation: AES-GCM Why:- Hardware acceleration on servers
- Compliance requirements (FIPS)
- Industry standard
- Well-integrated with databases
Wallet Encryption
Recommendation: Either (based on platform) Server/Desktop: AES-GCMFile Encryption
Recommendation: Either (based on size) Small files (<100 MB): Either works well Large files (>100 MB): AES-GCM (with AES-NI)- Faster throughput with hardware
- Better for bulk encryption
Web Applications
Recommendation: AES-GCM- Native browser support (WebCrypto)
- Hardware acceleration available
- No dependencies required
Performance Benchmarks
Desktop (Intel Core i7 with AES-NI)
| Algorithm | Throughput | Key Gen | Tag Verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| AES-128-GCM | 4.2 GB/s | 0.01ms | 0.01ms |
| AES-256-GCM | 3.1 GB/s | 0.01ms | 0.01ms |
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 | 1.4 GB/s | 0.01ms | 0.01ms |
Mobile (ARM Cortex-A76)
| Algorithm | Throughput | Battery (100 MB) |
|---|---|---|
| AES-128-GCM | 520 MB/s | 3.2 mAh |
| AES-256-GCM | 480 MB/s | 3.5 mAh |
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 | 780 MB/s | 2.1 mAh |
Embedded (ARM Cortex-M4, no crypto HW)
| Algorithm | Throughput | Code Size |
|---|---|---|
| AES-128-GCM | 8 MB/s | ~4 KB |
| AES-256-GCM | 6 MB/s | ~4 KB |
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 | 18 MB/s | ~2 KB |
Migration Guide
From AES-GCM to ChaCha20-Poly1305
- Key size: Always 32 bytes (256-bit)
- Nonce size: Same (12 bytes)
- API: Similar pattern
- Output format: Same (ciphertext || tag)
From ChaCha20-Poly1305 to AES-GCM
- Key handling: Use CryptoKey (async)
- API: Async operations
- Performance: Potentially faster (with AES-NI)
Decision Matrix
Choose AES-GCM if:- ✓ Running on server with AES-NI
- ✓ NIST/FIPS compliance required
- ✓ Industry standard needed
- ✓ Hardware acceleration available
- ✓ Integrating with existing systems
- ✓ Running on mobile/embedded
- ✓ No crypto hardware available
- ✓ Constant-time execution critical
- ✓ Simplicity/auditability important
- ✓ Better software performance needed
- ≈ Standard security requirements
- ≈ Both algorithms available
- ≈ Performance acceptable for both
- ≈ No specific compliance requirements
Hybrid Approach
Use both algorithms based on platform:Summary
Best Overall:- AES-GCM: Server, compliance, hardware available
- ChaCha20-Poly1305: Mobile, embedded, software-only

